- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- E12 V2.0 vs K4R
Fenix E12 V2.0 vs Ledlenser K4R
What E12 V2.0 does better (2) and where K4R wins (3) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
E12 V2.0K4R
| E12 V2.0 | K4R | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length / height | 76.6 mm | 50.8 mm | +25.8 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 19 mm | 22 mm | −3 mm |
| Weight | 27 g | 20 g | +7 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is E12 V2.0 better than K4R?
- Maximum runtime70 h vs 3.5 h20×
- Maximum output160 lm vs 120 lm+33%
Why is K4R better than E12 V2.0?
- Peak beam intensity1,160 cd vs 2,450 cd2.1×
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)68 m vs 99 m+46%
- Weight27 g vs 20 g+36%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 160 lm | 120 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 1,160 cd | 2,450 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 68 m | 99 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | AA | Built-in Li-ion / Li-Po |
| Maximum runtime | 70 h | 3.5 h |
| Rechargeable | — | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP68 | IP2X |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | — |
| Body material | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Pocket clip | Yes | — |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 76.6 mm | 50.8 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 19 mm | 22 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | 17.6 mm | — |
| Weight | 27 g | 20 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Brightness levels | 3 | — |
| Switch | Tail switch | — |
