- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- E12 V2.0 vs Tini
Fenix E12 V2.0 vs Nitecore Tini
What E12 V2.0 does better (3) and where Tini wins (2) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
E12 V2.0Tini
| E12 V2.0 | Tini | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length / height | 76.6 mm | 43 mm | +33.6 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 19 mm | 25 mm | −6 mm |
| Weight | 27 g | 13 g | +14 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is E12 V2.0 better than Tini?
- Water protection (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx42×
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)68 m vs 64 m+6%
- Maximum runtime70 h vs 60 h+17%
Why is Tini better than E12 V2.0?
- Maximum output160 lm vs 380 lm2.4×
- Weight27 g vs 13 g2.1×
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 160 lm | 380 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 1,160 cd | — |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 68 m | 64 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| Number of LEDs | — | 1 |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | AA | Built-in Li-ion / Li-Po |
| Maximum runtime | 70 h | 60 h |
| Rechargeable | — | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP68 | — |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx4 |
| Body material | — | Aluminium |
| Pocket clip | Yes | — |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 76.6 mm | 43 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 19 mm | 25 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | 17.6 mm | — |
| Weight | 27 g | 13 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Brightness levels | 3 | — |
| Switch | Tail switch | — |
