- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- E12 V2.0 vs Aurora A3 Pro
Fenix E12 V2.0 vs RovyVon Aurora A3 Pro
What E12 V2.0 does better (1) and where Aurora A3 Pro wins (1) — every spec side by side.
vs
5.4Brightness & throw8.1
9.4Battery & charging6.2
8.3Build & durability5.0
Why is E12 V2.0 better than Aurora A3 Pro?
- Water protection (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx6+33%
Why is Aurora A3 Pro better than E12 V2.0?
- Maximum output160 lm vs 650 lm4.1×
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 160 lm | 650 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 1,160 cd | — |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 68 m | — |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| Colour temperature | — | 7,000K |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | AA | — |
| Maximum runtime | 70 h | — |
| Rechargeable | — | Yes |
| USB-C charging | — | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP68 | IP66 |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx6 |
| Body material | — | Aluminium |
| Pocket clip | Yes | — |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 76.6 mm | — |
| Head diameter / width | 19 mm | — |
| Body diameter / depth | 17.6 mm | — |
| Weight | 27 g | — |
| Modes & features | ||
| Brightness levels | 3 | — |
| Switch | Tail switch | — |
