How we scoreBlogAdvertise
html›body›main#compare1,103 models · updated Oct 23, 2026
  1. compoundsemi.com
  2. Compare
  3. E18R V2.0 vs Taschenlampe 3315 138

Fenix E18R V2.0 vs Peli Taschenlampe 3315 138

What E18R V2.0 does better (1) and where Taschenlampe 3315 138 wins (0) — every spec side by side.

Fenix E18R V2.0
Fenix · 2022E18R V2.0
7.4Score
1 advantage≈ $60
Higher score
vs
Peli Taschenlampe 3315 138
0 advantages≈ $55
3.7Brightness & throw2.7

Why is E18R V2.0 better than Taschenlampe 3315 138?

  1. Maximum output1,200 lm vs 138 lm8.7×

Why is Taschenlampe 3315 138 better than E18R V2.0?

Taschenlampe 3315 138 has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Specifications

Side by side

Fenix E18R V2.0Fenix E18R V2.0≈ $607.4
Light output
Maximum output1,200 lm138 lm
Peak beam intensity5,330 cd—
Beam distance (ANSI FL1)146 m146 m
Light sourceLEDLED
LED & beam
LED emitterLuminus SST-40—
LED makerLuminus—
Colour temperature6,000K—
Battery & charging
Battery16340 / RCR123A Li-ion, CR123AAA
Number of batteries—3
Maximum runtime200 h—
RechargeableYes—
USB-C chargingYes—
Battery level indicatorYes—
Build & durability
Protection ratingIP68—
Water protection (IPx)IPx8—
Body materialAluminiumPlastic / polymer
Magnetic tail / baseYes—
Pocket clipYes—
Size & weight
Length / height67 mm—
Weight56 g—
Modes & features
Brightness levels5—
SwitchDual switches—
StrobeYes—
LockoutYes—
Mode memoryYes—
Colours—Yellow
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare