- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- LD22 V2.0 vs Taschenlampe 3315 138
Fenix LD22 V2.0 vs Peli Taschenlampe 3315 138
What LD22 V2.0 does better (2) and where Taschenlampe 3315 138 wins (0) — every spec side by side.
vs
4.5Brightness & throw3.0
Why is LD22 V2.0 better than Taschenlampe 3315 138?
- Maximum output800 lm vs 138 lm5.8×
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)214 m vs 146 m+47%
Why is Taschenlampe 3315 138 better than LD22 V2.0?
Taschenlampe 3315 138 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 800 lm | 138 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 11,450 cd | — |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 214 m | 146 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Luminus SST-20 | — |
| LED maker | Luminus | — |
| Colour temperature | 6,000K | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | AA | AA |
| Number of batteries | — | 3 |
| Maximum runtime | 220 h | — |
| Rechargeable | Yes | — |
| USB-C charging | Yes | — |
| Also runs on AA/AAA/CR123A | Yes | — |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP68 | — |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | — |
| Submersible to | 2 m | — |
| Body material | Aluminium | Plastic / polymer |
| Pocket clip | Yes | — |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 148 mm | — |
| Head diameter / width | 21 mm | — |
| Body diameter / depth | 18 mm | — |
| Weight | 96 g | — |
| Modes & features | ||
| Brightness levels | 5 | — |
| Strobe | Yes | — |
| SOS / beacon | Yes | — |
| Red light | Yes | — |
| Green / blue / RGB light | Yes | — |
| Mode memory | Yes | — |
| Colours | Black | Yellow |
