- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- E28R V2.0 vs LD42
Fenix E28R V2.0 vs Fenix LD42
What E28R V2.0 does better (2) and where LD42 wins (3) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
E28R V2.0LD42
| E28R V2.0 | LD42 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length / height | 121 mm | 159.5 mm | −38.5 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 26.5 mm | 34 mm | −7.5 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | 22.5 mm | 32.5 mm | −10 mm |
| Weight | 128 g | 99 g | +29 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is E28R V2.0 better than LD42?
- Maximum output1,700 lm vs 350 lm4.9×
- Maximum runtime260 h vs 130.3 h+100%
Why is LD42 better than E28R V2.0?
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)273 m vs 350 m+28%
- Peak beam intensity18,630 cd vs 30,620 cd+64%
- Weight128 g vs 99 g+29%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 1,700 lm | 350 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 18,630 cd | 30,620 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 273 m | 350 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Luminus SST-40 | — |
| LED maker | Luminus | — |
| Colour temperature | 6,500K | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | 18650 Li-ion, CR123A | AA |
| Battery capacity | 3,400 mAh | — |
| Maximum runtime | 260 h | 130.3 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | — |
| USB-C charging | Yes | — |
| Battery level indicator | Yes | — |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP68 | — |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | — |
| Body material | — | Aluminium |
| Magnetic tail / base | Yes | — |
| Pocket clip | Yes | Yes |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 121 mm | 159.5 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 26.5 mm | 34 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | 22.5 mm | 32.5 mm |
| Weight | 128 g | 99 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Brightness levels | — | 5 |
| Switch | Side switch | Rotary / scroll wheel |
| Strobe | Yes | — |
| Lockout | Yes | — |
| Mode memory | Yes | — |
