How we scoreBlogAdvertise
html›body›main#compare1,338 models · updated Nov 11, 2026
  1. compoundsemi.com
  2. Compare
  3. E28R V2.0 vs ML300L 4D

Fenix E28R V2.0 vs Maglite ML300L 4D

What E28R V2.0 does better (2) and where ML300L 4D wins (1) — every spec side by side.

Fenix E28R V2.0
Fenix · 2020E28R V2.0
7.6Score
2 advantages≈ $65
vs
Maglite ML300L 4D
Maglite · 2020ML300L 4D
7.7Score
1 advantage≈ $100
Higher score
5.9Brightness & throw5.4
8.1Battery & charging9.1

Why is E28R V2.0 better than ML300L 4D?

  1. Maximum output1,700 lm vs 1,002 lm+70%
  2. RechargeableYes · ML300L 4D: No

Why is ML300L 4D better than E28R V2.0?

  1. Maximum runtime260 h vs 434 h+67%
Specifications

Side by side

Fenix E28R V2.0Fenix E28R V2.0≈ $657.6
Light output
Maximum output1,700 lm1,002 lm
Peak beam intensity18,630 cd—
Beam distance (ANSI FL1)273 m—
Light sourceLEDLED
LED & beam
LED emitterLuminus SST-40—
LED makerLuminus—
Colour temperature6,500K—
Battery & charging
Battery18650 Li-ion, CR123A—
Number of batteries1—
Battery capacity3,400 mAh—
Maximum runtime260 h434 h
RechargeableYesNo
USB-C chargingYes—
Battery level indicatorYes—
Build & durability
Protection ratingIP68—
Water protection (IPx)IPx8—
Body materialAluminium—
Magnetic tail / baseYes—
Pocket clipYes—
Size & weight
Length / height121 mm—
Head diameter / width26.5 mm—
Body diameter / depth22.5 mm—
Weight128 g—
Modes & features
SwitchSide switch—
StrobeYes—
LockoutYes—
Mode memoryYes—
ColoursBlackBlack
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare