- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- E28R V2.0 vs MH10 V2.0
Fenix E28R V2.0 vs Nitecore MH10 V2.0
What E28R V2.0 does better (2) and where MH10 V2.0 wins (2) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
E28R V2.0MH10 V2.0
| E28R V2.0 | MH10 V2.0 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length / height | 121 mm | 130 mm | −9 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 26.5 mm | 25 mm | +1.5 mm |
| Weight | 128 g | 75 g | +53 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is E28R V2.0 better than MH10 V2.0?
- Maximum output1,700 lm vs 1,000 lm+70%
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)273 m vs 232 m+18%
Why is MH10 V2.0 better than E28R V2.0?
- Maximum runtime260 h vs 520 h2×
- Weight128 g vs 75 g+71%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 1,700 lm | 1,000 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 18,630 cd | — |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 273 m | 232 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Luminus SST-40 | — |
| LED maker | Luminus | — |
| Colour temperature | 6,500K | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | 18650 Li-ion, CR123A | 18650 Li-ion, CR123A |
| Number of batteries | 1 | — |
| Battery capacity | 3,400 mAh | — |
| Maximum runtime | 260 h | 520 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | Yes | — |
| Battery level indicator | Yes | — |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP68 | — |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Submersible to | — | 2 m |
| Body material | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Magnetic tail / base | Yes | — |
| Pocket clip | Yes | — |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 121 mm | 130 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 26.5 mm | 25 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | 22.5 mm | — |
| Weight | 128 g | 75 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Switch | Side switch | — |
| Strobe | Yes | Yes |
| SOS / beacon | — | Yes |
| Lockout | Yes | — |
| Mode memory | Yes | — |
| Colours | Black | Black |
