- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- E30R vs PD35 TAC
Fenix E30R vs Fenix PD35 TAC
What E30R does better (3) and where PD35 TAC wins (1) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
E30RPD35 TAC
| E30R | PD35 TAC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length / height | 99 mm | 137 mm | −38 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 25.4 mm | 25.4 mm | = |
| Weight | 51 g | 88 g | −37 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is E30R better than PD35 TAC?
- Maximum output1,600 lm vs 1,000 lm+60%
- Weight51 g vs 88 g+73%
- Peak beam intensity10,300 cd vs 10,000 cd+3%
Why is PD35 TAC better than E30R?
- Maximum runtime70.5 h vs 140 h+99%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 1,600 lm | 1,000 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 10,300 cd | 10,000 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 203 m | 200 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Luminus SST-40 | Cree XP-L |
| LED maker | Luminus | Cree |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | 18650 Li-ion, CR123A | 18650 Li-ion, CR123A |
| Battery capacity | 3,400 mAh | — |
| Maximum runtime | 70.5 h | 140 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| Magnetic charging | Yes | — |
| Battery level indicator | Yes | — |
| Build & durability | ||
| Pocket clip | Yes | — |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 99 mm | 137 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 25.4 mm | 25.4 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | 21.5 mm | — |
| Weight | 51 g | 88 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Brightness levels | 5 | 5 |
| Switch | Side switch | — |
| Strobe | Yes | Yes |
