- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- E30R vs PD35 V3.0
Fenix E30R vs Fenix PD35 V3.0
What E30R does better (1) and where PD35 V3.0 wins (4) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
E30RPD35 V3.0
| E30R | PD35 V3.0 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length / height | 99 mm | 134 mm | −35 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 25.4 mm | 25.4 mm | = |
| Body diameter / depth | 21.5 mm | 22.8 mm | −1.3 mm |
| Weight | 51 g | 84 g | −33 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is E30R better than PD35 V3.0?
- Weight51 g vs 84 g+65%
Why is PD35 V3.0 better than E30R?
- Peak beam intensity10,300 cd vs 31,860 cd3.1×
- Maximum runtime70.5 h vs 230 h3.3×
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)203 m vs 357 m+76%
- Maximum output1,600 lm vs 1,700 lm+6%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 1,600 lm | 1,700 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 10,300 cd | 31,860 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 203 m | 357 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Luminus SST-40 | Luminus SFT-40 |
| LED maker | Luminus | Luminus |
| Number of LEDs | — | 1 |
| Colour temperature | — | 6,000K |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | 18650 Li-ion, CR123A | 18650 Li-ion, CR123A |
| Battery capacity | 3,400 mAh | — |
| Maximum runtime | 70.5 h | 230 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | — | Yes |
| Magnetic charging | Yes | — |
| Battery level indicator | Yes | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | — | IP68 |
| Water protection (IPx) | — | IPx8 |
| Body material | — | Aluminium |
| Pocket clip | Yes | Yes |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 99 mm | 134 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 25.4 mm | 25.4 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | 21.5 mm | 22.8 mm |
| Weight | 51 g | 84 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Brightness levels | 5 | 5 |
| Switch | Side switch | Dual switches |
| Tactical tail switch (momentary on) | — | Yes |
| Strobe | Yes | Yes |
| Mode memory | — | Yes |
