- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- E30R vs ML300LX-S2016
Fenix E30R vs Maglite ML300LX-S2016
What E30R does better (3) and where ML300LX-S2016 wins (1) — every spec side by side.
vs
4.2Brightness & throw4.6
9.7Build & durability2.3
7.9Light quality5.5
Dimensions
Size comparison
E30RML300LX-S2016
| E30R | ML300LX-S2016 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length / height | 99 mm | 230 mm | −131 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 25.4 mm | 57 mm | −31.6 mm |
| Weight | 51 g | 566 g | −515 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is E30R better than ML300LX-S2016?
- Maximum output1,600 lm vs 524 lm3.1×
- Weight51 g vs 566 g11.1×
- Maximum runtime70.5 h vs 69 h+2%
Why is ML300LX-S2016 better than E30R?
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)203 m vs 366 m+80%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 1,600 lm | 524 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 10,300 cd | — |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 203 m | 366 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| Adjustable focus (zoom) | — | Yes |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Luminus SST-40 | — |
| LED maker | Luminus | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | 18650 Li-ion, CR123A | D |
| Number of batteries | — | 2 |
| Battery capacity | 3,400 mAh | — |
| Maximum runtime | 70.5 h | 69 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | — |
| Magnetic charging | Yes | — |
| Battery level indicator | Yes | — |
| Build & durability | ||
| Water protection (IPx) | — | IPx4 |
| Body material | — | Aluminium |
| Pocket clip | Yes | — |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 99 mm | 230 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 25.4 mm | 57 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | 21.5 mm | — |
| Weight | 51 g | 566 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Brightness levels | 5 | — |
| Switch | Side switch | — |
| Strobe | Yes | — |
| Colours | — | Black |
