- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- E35 V3.0 vs PD35 TAC
Fenix E35 V3.0 vs Fenix PD35 TAC
What E35 V3.0 does better (4) and where PD35 TAC wins (1) — every spec side by side.
Why is E35 V3.0 better than PD35 TAC?
- Maximum output3,000 lm vs 1,000 lm3×
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)240 m vs 200 m+20%
- Peak beam intensity14,400 cd vs 10,000 cd+44%
- Weight67 g vs 88 g+31%
Why is PD35 TAC better than E35 V3.0?
- Maximum runtime50 h vs 140 h2.8×
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 3,000 lm | 1,000 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 14,400 cd | 10,000 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 240 m | 200 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Luminus SST-70 | Cree XP-L |
| LED maker | Luminus | Cree |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | 21700 Li-ion | 18650 Li-ion, CR123A |
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | — |
| Maximum runtime | 50 h | 140 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | Yes | — |
| Battery level indicator | Yes | — |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 118 mm | 137 mm |
| Head diameter / width | — | 25.4 mm |
| Weight | 67 g | 88 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Brightness levels | 5 | 5 |
| Switch | Side switch | — |
| Strobe | Yes | Yes |
