How we scoreBlogAdvertise
html›body›main#compare791 models · updated Oct 21, 2026
  1. compoundsemi.com
  2. Compare
  3. E35 V3.0 vs DM35

Fenix E35 V3.0 vs Imalent DM35

What E35 V3.0 does better (3) and where DM35 wins (3) — every spec side by side.

Fenix E35 V3.0
Fenix · 2020E35 V3.0
8.6Score
3 advantages≈ $75
Higher score
vs
Imalent DM35
Imalent · 2019DM35
8.6Score
3 advantages≈ $95
5.3Brightness & throw6.9
5.7Battery & charging6.9
9.6Build & durability8.5
5.9Features5.9

Why is E35 V3.0 better than DM35?

  1. Maximum output3,000 lm vs 2,000 lm+50%
  2. USB-C chargingYes · DM35: No
  3. Weight67 g vs 87 g+30%

Why is DM35 better than E35 V3.0?

  1. Beam distance (ANSI FL1)240 m vs 450 m+88%
  2. Peak beam intensity14,400 cd vs 50,960 cd3.5×
  3. Maximum runtime50 h vs 192 h3.8×
Specifications

Side by side

Fenix E35 V3.0Fenix E35 V3.0≈ $758.6
Imalent DM35Imalent DM35≈ $958.6
Light output
Maximum output3,000 lm2,000 lm
Peak beam intensity14,400 cd50,960 cd
Beam distance (ANSI FL1)240 m450 m
Light sourceLEDLED
LED & beam
LED emitterLuminus SST-70Cree XHP
LED makerLuminusCree
Battery & charging
Battery21700 Li-ion21700 Li-ion, AAA
Battery capacity5,000 mAh5,000 mAh
Maximum runtime50 h192 h
RechargeableYesYes
USB-C chargingYesNo
Battery level indicatorYes—
Build & durability
Submersible to—2 m
Impact resistance (drop)—1.5 m
Body material—Aluminium
Magnetic tail / base—Yes
Pocket clip—Yes
Can tail-stand—Yes
Size & weight
Length / height118 mm—
Weight67 g87 g
Modes & features
Brightness levels5—
SwitchSide switch—
StrobeYes—
Red light—Yes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare