- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- PD35 V2.0 Digital vs DM35
Fenix PD35 V2.0 Digital vs Imalent DM35
What PD35 V2.0 Digital does better (1) and where DM35 wins (3) — every spec side by side.
vs
4.2Brightness & throw6.9
9.7Battery & charging6.9
8.8Build & durability8.5
5.9Features5.9
Why is PD35 V2.0 Digital better than DM35?
- Maximum runtime430 h vs 192 h2.2×
Why is DM35 better than PD35 V2.0 Digital?
- Maximum output1,000 lm vs 2,000 lm2×
- Peak beam intensity15,620 cd vs 50,960 cd3.3×
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)250 m vs 450 m+80%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 1,000 lm | 2,000 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 15,620 cd | 50,960 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 250 m | 450 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Cree XP-L HI | Cree XHP |
| LED maker | Cree | Cree |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | — | 21700 Li-ion, AAA |
| Battery capacity | — | 5,000 mAh |
| Maximum runtime | 430 h | 192 h |
| Rechargeable | — | Yes |
| USB-C charging | — | No |
| Battery level indicator | Yes | — |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP68 | — |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | — |
| Submersible to | — | 2 m |
| Impact resistance (drop) | — | 1.5 m |
| Body material | — | Aluminium |
| Magnetic tail / base | — | Yes |
| Pocket clip | — | Yes |
| Can tail-stand | — | Yes |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 138 mm | — |
| Head diameter / width | 25.4 mm | — |
| Body diameter / depth | 23 mm | — |
| Weight | 88 g | 87 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Brightness levels | 5 | — |
| Switch | Dual switches | — |
| Strobe | Yes | — |
| Red light | — | Yes |
