- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- E35R vs TK11R
Fenix E35R vs Fenix TK11R
What E35R does better (2) and where TK11R wins (3) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
E35RTK11R
| E35R | TK11R | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length / height | 120 mm | 145.5 mm | −25.5 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 26.5 mm | 34 mm | −7.5 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | 24.8 mm | 23.5 mm | +1.3 mm |
| Weight | 148 g | 117 g | +31 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is E35R better than TK11R?
- Maximum output3,100 lm vs 1,600 lm+94%
- Maximum runtime69 h vs 25.5 h2.7×
Why is TK11R better than E35R?
- Peak beam intensity16,900 cd vs 44,100 cd2.6×
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)260 m vs 420 m+62%
- Weight148 g vs 117 g+26%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 3,100 lm | 1,600 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 16,900 cd | 44,100 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 260 m | 420 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Luminus SST-70 | Luminus SFT-40 |
| LED maker | Luminus | Luminus |
| Colour temperature | 6,400K | 6,700K |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | 21700 Li-ion | 18650 Li-ion, CR123A |
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | — |
| Maximum runtime | 69 h | 25.5 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | Yes | Yes |
| Battery level indicator | Yes | Yes |
| Also runs on AA/AAA/CR123A | — | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP68 | IP68 |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Body material | Aluminium | — |
| Magnetic tail / base | Yes | — |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 120 mm | 145.5 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 26.5 mm | 34 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | 24.8 mm | 23.5 mm |
| Weight | 148 g | 117 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Switch | Side switch | Dual switches |
| Strobe | Yes | Yes |
| Lockout | Yes | — |
| Mode memory | Yes | Yes |
| Colours | Black | — |
