- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- E75 vs E35R
Acebeam E75 vs Fenix E35R
What E75 does better (1) and where E35R wins (2) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
E75E35R
| E75 | E35R | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length / height | 129.3 mm | 120 mm | +9.3 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 35 mm | 26.5 mm | +8.5 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | 28 mm | 24.8 mm | +3.2 mm |
| Weight | 217 g | 148 g | +69 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is E75 better than E35R?
- Maximum output4,500 lm vs 3,100 lm+45%
Why is E35R better than E75?
- Maximum runtime16 h vs 69 h4.3×
- Weight217 g vs 148 g+47%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 4,500 lm | 3,100 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 16,900 cd | 16,900 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 260 m | 260 m |
| Runtime at maximum output | 1 min | — |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Nichia 519A | Luminus SST-70 |
| LED maker | Nichia | Luminus |
| Number of LEDs | 51 | — |
| Colour rendering (CRI) | 90 | — |
| Colour temperature | 3,000K | 6,400K |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | 21700 Li-ion | 21700 Li-ion |
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Maximum runtime | 16 h | 69 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | Yes | Yes |
| Battery level indicator | Yes | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP68 | IP68 |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Submersible to | 2 m | — |
| Impact resistance (drop) | 1.5 m | — |
| Body material | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Magnetic tail / base | Yes | Yes |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 129.3 mm | 120 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 35 mm | 26.5 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | 28 mm | 24.8 mm |
| Weight | 217 g | 148 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Brightness levels | 6 | — |
| Switch | Side switch | Side switch |
| Strobe | Yes | Yes |
| Green / blue / RGB light | Yes | — |
| Lockout | — | Yes |
| Mode memory | — | Yes |
| Colours | Grey, Blue, Silver, Black, Green | Black |
