- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- E35R vs ML25L
Fenix E35R vs Maglite ML25L
What E35R does better (3) and where ML25L wins (2) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
E35RML25L
| E35R | ML25L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length / height | 120 mm | 168 mm | −48 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 26.5 mm | 43 mm | −16.5 mm |
| Weight | 148 g | 317 g | −169 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is E35R better than ML25L?
- Maximum output3,100 lm vs 192 lm16.1×
- Weight148 g vs 317 g2.1×
- Water protection (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx42×
Why is ML25L better than E35R?
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)260 m vs 337 m+30%
- Maximum runtime69 h vs 72 h+4%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 3,100 lm | 192 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 16,900 cd | — |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 260 m | 337 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Luminus SST-70 | — |
| LED maker | Luminus | — |
| Colour temperature | 6,400K | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | 21700 Li-ion | Built-in Li-ion / Li-Po |
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | — |
| Maximum runtime | 69 h | 72 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | Yes | — |
| Battery level indicator | Yes | — |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP68 | — |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx4 |
| Body material | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Magnetic tail / base | Yes | — |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 120 mm | 168 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 26.5 mm | 43 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | 24.8 mm | — |
| Weight | 148 g | 317 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Switch | Side switch | — |
| Strobe | Yes | — |
| Lockout | Yes | — |
| Mode memory | Yes | — |
| Colours | Black | Black |
