How we scoreBlogAdvertise
html›body›main#compare791 models · updated Oct 21, 2026
  1. compoundsemi.com
  2. Compare
  3. GL19R V2.0 vs UT10

Fenix GL19R V2.0 vs Imalent UT10

What GL19R V2.0 does better (4) and where UT10 wins (1) — every spec side by side.

Fenix GL19R V2.0
Fenix · 2024GL19R V2.0
6.3Score
4 advantages≈ $100
Higher score
vs
Imalent UT10
Imalent · 2020UT10
3.9Score
1 advantage≈ $90
9.0Brightness & throw5.9
3.5Battery & charging5.7
3.7Build & durability2.7

Why is GL19R V2.0 better than UT10?

  1. Beam distance (ANSI FL1)420 m vs 213 m+97%
  2. Peak beam intensity44,100 cd vs 5,690 cd7.8×
  3. Maximum output1,200 lm vs 1,160 lm+3%
  4. Weight119 g vs 128 g+8%

Why is UT10 better than GL19R V2.0?

  1. Maximum runtime0.9 h vs 2 h2.2×
Specifications

Side by side

Fenix GL19R V2.0Fenix GL19R V2.0≈ $1006.3
Imalent UT10Imalent UT10≈ $903.9
Light output
Maximum output1,200 lm1,160 lm
Peak beam intensity44,100 cd5,690 cd
Beam distance (ANSI FL1)420 m213 m
Light sourceLEDLED
LED & beam
LED emitterLuminus SFT-25RCree XP-L HI
LED makerLuminusCree
Colour temperature6,000K—
Battery & charging
Battery18350 Li-ion18350 Li-ion
Battery capacity—1,100 mAh
Maximum runtime0.9 h2 h
RechargeableYesYes
USB-C chargingYes—
Magnetic charging—Yes
Battery level indicatorYes—
Build & durability
Protection ratingIP66—
Water protection (IPx)IPx6—
Submersible to—1 m
Impact resistance (drop)—1 m
Body material—Aluminium
Size & weight
Length / height94 mm—
Head diameter / width31 mm—
Body diameter / depth32 mm—
Weight119 g128 g
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare