- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- GL19R V2.0 vs NEXDOT WL15
Fenix GL19R V2.0 vs Nextorch NEXDOT WL15
What GL19R V2.0 does better (0) and where NEXDOT WL15 wins (2) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.0Brightness & throw9.0
3.7Build & durability6.6
Dimensions
Size comparison
GL19R V2.0NEXDOT WL15
| GL19R V2.0 | NEXDOT WL15 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length / height | 94 mm | 78.5 mm | +15.5 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 31 mm | 36.5 mm | −5.5 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | 32 mm | 32.5 mm | −0.5 mm |
| Weight | 119 g | 73 g | +46 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is GL19R V2.0 better than NEXDOT WL15?
GL19R V2.0 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is NEXDOT WL15 better than GL19R V2.0?
- Weight119 g vs 73 g+63%
- Water protection (IPx)IPx6 vs IPx7+17%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 1,200 lm | 1,200 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 44,100 cd | 44,100 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 420 m | 420 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Luminus SFT-25R | — |
| LED maker | Luminus | — |
| Colour temperature | 6,000K | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | 18350 Li-ion | 16340 / RCR123A Li-ion, CR123A |
| Maximum runtime | 0.9 h | — |
| Rechargeable | Yes | — |
| USB-C charging | Yes | — |
| Battery level indicator | Yes | — |
| Also runs on AA/AAA/CR123A | — | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP66 | IPX7 |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx6 | IPx7 |
| Submersible to | — | 1 m |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 94 mm | 78.5 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 31 mm | 36.5 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | 32 mm | 32.5 mm |
| Weight | 119 g | 73 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Tactical tail switch (momentary on) | — | Yes |
| Mode memory | — | Yes |
