- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- HL32R-T vs oStar
Fenix HL32R-T vs Nextorch oStar
What HL32R-T does better (3) and where oStar wins (1) — every spec side by side.
Why is HL32R-T better than oStar?
- Maximum runtime150 h vs 60 h2.5×
- Maximum output800 lm vs 500 lm+60%
- Water protection (IPx)IPx6 vs IPx4+50%
Why is oStar better than HL32R-T?
- Weight107 g vs 87 g+23%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 800 lm | 500 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 4,360 cd | 4,290 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 132 m | 131 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Luminus SST-20 | — |
| LED maker | Luminus | — |
| Colour temperature | 6,500K | — |
| Adjustable colour temperature | Yes | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | AAA | 18650 Li-ion |
| Maximum runtime | 150 h | 60 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | Yes | — |
| Battery level indicator | Yes | — |
| Also runs on AA/AAA/CR123A | Yes | — |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP66 | IPX4 |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx6 | IPx4 |
| Submersible to | 2 m | — |
| Impact resistance (drop) | — | 2 m |
| Body material | Magnesium | — |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | — | 78 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 66 mm | 65 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | 45 mm | 46 mm |
| Weight | 107 g | 87 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Switch | Dual switches | — |
| SOS / beacon | Yes | — |
| Lockout | Yes | — |
| Mode memory | Yes | — |
| Colours | Red | — |
