- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- HL32R-T vs Actik Core
Fenix HL32R-T vs Petzl Actik Core
What HL32R-T does better (4) and where Actik Core wins (2) — every spec side by side.
vs
6.2Brightness & throw5.4
7.6Battery & charging5.0
4.6Build & durability8.3
Why is HL32R-T better than Actik Core?
- Maximum output800 lm vs 625 lm+28%
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)132 m vs 115 m+15%
- Maximum runtime150 h vs 100 h+50%
- Peak beam intensity4,360 cd vs 3,310 cd+32%
Why is Actik Core better than HL32R-T?
- Water protection (IPx)IPx6 vs IPx8+33%
- Weight107 g vs 88 g+22%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 800 lm | 625 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 4,360 cd | 3,310 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 132 m | 115 m |
| Runtime at maximum output | — | 120 min |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Luminus SST-20 | — |
| LED maker | Luminus | — |
| Colour temperature | 6,500K | — |
| Adjustable colour temperature | Yes | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | AAA | AAA |
| Number of batteries | — | 3 |
| Battery capacity | — | 1,250 mAh |
| Maximum runtime | 150 h | 100 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | Yes | Yes |
| Charging time | — | 3.5 h |
| Battery level indicator | Yes | — |
| Also runs on AA/AAA/CR123A | Yes | — |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP66 | — |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx6 | IPx8 |
| Submersible to | 2 m | 2 m |
| Body material | Magnesium | — |
| Size & weight | ||
| Head diameter / width | 66 mm | — |
| Body diameter / depth | 45 mm | — |
| Weight | 107 g | 88 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Switch | Dual switches | — |
| Strobe | — | Yes |
| SOS / beacon | Yes | — |
| Lockout | Yes | — |
| Mode memory | Yes | — |
| Colours | Red | — |
