- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- HL32R-T vs Swift RL
Fenix HL32R-T vs Petzl Swift RL
What HL32R-T does better (3) and where Swift RL wins (3) — every spec side by side.
Why is HL32R-T better than Swift RL?
- Maximum runtime150 h vs 100 h+50%
- Water protection (IPx)IPx6 vs IPx4+50%
- Weight107 g vs 110 g+3%
Why is Swift RL better than HL32R-T?
- Maximum output800 lm vs 1,100 lm+38%
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)132 m vs 155 m+17%
- Peak beam intensity4,360 cd vs 6,010 cd+38%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 800 lm | 1,100 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 4,360 cd | 6,010 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 132 m | 155 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Luminus SST-20 | — |
| LED maker | Luminus | — |
| Colour temperature | 6,500K | — |
| Adjustable colour temperature | Yes | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | AAA | Built-in Li-ion / Li-Po |
| Battery capacity | — | 2,350 mAh |
| Maximum runtime | 150 h | 100 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | Yes | Yes |
| Charging time | — | 5 h |
| Battery level indicator | Yes | Yes |
| Also runs on AA/AAA/CR123A | Yes | — |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP66 | — |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx6 | IPx4 |
| Submersible to | 2 m | — |
| Body material | Magnesium | — |
| Size & weight | ||
| Head diameter / width | 66 mm | — |
| Body diameter / depth | 45 mm | — |
| Weight | 107 g | 110 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Switch | Dual switches | — |
| Strobe | — | Yes |
| SOS / beacon | Yes | — |
| Red light | — | Yes |
| Motion / reactive sensor | — | Yes |
| Lockout | Yes | — |
| Mode memory | Yes | — |
| Colours | Red | — |
