- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- HM55R vs PIXA R
Fenix HM55R vs Petzl PIXA R
What HM55R does better (6) and where PIXA R wins (0) — every spec side by side.
Why is HM55R better than PIXA R?
- Maximum output1,200 lm vs 600 lm2×
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)175 m vs 90 m+94%
- Peak beam intensity7,660 cd vs 2,020 cd3.8×
- Maximum runtime147 h vs 12 h12.2×
- Battery capacity1,600 mAh vs 1,250 mAh+28%
- Weight105 g vs 130 g+24%
Why is PIXA R better than HM55R?
PIXA R has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 1,200 lm | 600 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 7,660 cd | 2,020 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 175 m | 90 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Luminus SST-25 | — |
| LED maker | Luminus | — |
| Colour rendering (CRI) | 90 | — |
| Colour temperature | 6,500K | — |
| Adjustable colour temperature | Yes | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | 18350 Li-ion | Built-in Li-ion / Li-Po |
| Battery capacity | 1,600 mAh | 1,250 mAh |
| Maximum runtime | 147 h | 12 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | Yes | — |
| Charging time | — | 3.5 h |
| Battery level indicator | Yes | — |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP68 | — |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Submersible to | — | 2 m |
| Body material | Aluminium | — |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 64 mm | — |
| Head diameter / width | 34 mm | — |
| Body diameter / depth | 44 mm | — |
| Weight | 105 g | 130 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Switch | Dual switches | — |
| Strobe | Yes | — |
| Red light | Yes | — |
| Lockout | Yes | — |
| Mode memory | Yes | — |
| Colours | Black | Black, Yellow |
