- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- HM61R V3.0 vs HA29 UHE MCT
Fenix HM61R V3.0 vs Nitecore HA29 UHE MCT
What HM61R V3.0 does better (4) and where HA29 UHE MCT wins (1) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.3Brightness & throw7.3
9.2Battery & charging7.9
7.2Build & durability7.8
8.2Light quality5.7
5.9Features5.9
Why is HM61R V3.0 better than HA29 UHE MCT?
- Maximum runtime300 h vs 122 h2.5×
- Maximum output1,800 lm vs 1,200 lm+50%
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)195 m vs 169 m+15%
- Peak beam intensity9,510 cd vs 7,140 cd+33%
Why is HA29 UHE MCT better than HM61R V3.0?
- Weight168 g vs 112 g+50%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 1,800 lm | 1,200 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 9,510 cd | 7,140 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 195 m | 169 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Luminus SST-40 | — |
| LED maker | Luminus | — |
| Colour rendering (CRI) | 90 | — |
| Colour temperature | 6,500K | 3,000K |
| Adjustable colour temperature | — | Yes |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | 18650 Li-ion, CR123A | AAA |
| Battery capacity | 4,000 mAh | — |
| Maximum runtime | 300 h | 122 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | Yes | — |
| Battery level indicator | Yes | — |
| Also runs on AA/AAA/CR123A | — | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP68 | IPX8 |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Submersible to | 2 m | — |
| Impact resistance (drop) | 2 m | — |
| Body material | Aluminium | — |
| Magnetic tail / base | Yes | — |
| Pocket clip | — | Yes |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 105.4 mm | — |
| Head diameter / width | 38 mm | — |
| Body diameter / depth | 51 mm | — |
| Weight | 168 g | 112 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Switch | Dual switches | — |
| Red light | Yes | Yes |
| Motion / reactive sensor | Yes | — |
| Lockout | Yes | Yes |
| Mode memory | Yes | — |
| Colours | Black | — |
