- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- HM61R V3.0 vs HC75 UHE
Fenix HM61R V3.0 vs Nitecore HC75 UHE
What HM61R V3.0 does better (3) and where HC75 UHE wins (2) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.3Brightness & throw8.6
9.2Battery & charging7.6
7.2Build & durability6.4
8.2Light quality5.7
5.9Features5.9
Why is HM61R V3.0 better than HC75 UHE?
- Maximum runtime300 h vs 84 h3.6×
- Weight168 g vs 209 g+24%
- Peak beam intensity9,510 cd vs 9,216 cd+3%
Why is HC75 UHE better than HM61R V3.0?
- Maximum output1,800 lm vs 3,000 lm+67%
- Battery capacity4,000 mAh vs 5,500 mAh+38%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 1,800 lm | 3,000 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 9,510 cd | 9,216 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 195 m | 192 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| Adjustable focus (zoom) | — | Yes |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Luminus SST-40 | — |
| LED maker | Luminus | — |
| Number of LEDs | — | 8 |
| Colour rendering (CRI) | 90 | — |
| Colour temperature | 6,500K | 4,500K |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | 18650 Li-ion, CR123A | — |
| Battery capacity | 4,000 mAh | 5,500 mAh |
| Maximum runtime | 300 h | 84 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | Yes | Yes |
| Battery level indicator | Yes | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP68 | IP68 |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Submersible to | 2 m | — |
| Impact resistance (drop) | 2 m | — |
| Body material | Aluminium | — |
| Magnetic tail / base | Yes | — |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 105.4 mm | — |
| Head diameter / width | 38 mm | — |
| Body diameter / depth | 51 mm | — |
| Weight | 168 g | 209 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Stepless (ramping) brightness | — | Yes |
| Switch | Dual switches | — |
| SOS / beacon | — | Yes |
| Red light | Yes | Yes |
| Motion / reactive sensor | Yes | — |
| Lockout | Yes | Yes |
| Mode memory | Yes | — |
| Colours | Black | Black |
