- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- HM61R V3.0 vs Nao LT
Fenix HM61R V3.0 vs Petzl Nao LT
What HM61R V3.0 does better (5) and where Nao LT wins (1) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.3Brightness & throw4.3
9.2Battery & charging4.6
7.2Build & durability8.2
5.9Features5.9
Why is HM61R V3.0 better than Nao LT?
- Maximum output1,800 lm vs 600 lm3×
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)195 m vs 75 m2.6×
- Peak beam intensity9,510 cd vs 1,410 cd6.7×
- Battery capacity4,000 mAh vs 1,250 mAh3.2×
- Maximum runtime300 h vs 85 h3.5×
Why is Nao LT better than HM61R V3.0?
- Weight168 g vs 90 g+87%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 1,800 lm | 600 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 9,510 cd | 1,410 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 195 m | 75 m |
| Runtime at maximum output | — | 120 min |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Luminus SST-40 | — |
| LED maker | Luminus | — |
| Colour rendering (CRI) | 90 | — |
| Colour temperature | 6,500K | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | 18650 Li-ion, CR123A | AAA |
| Number of batteries | — | 3 |
| Battery capacity | 4,000 mAh | 1,250 mAh |
| Maximum runtime | 300 h | 85 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | Yes | Yes |
| Charging time | — | 3.5 h |
| Battery level indicator | Yes | — |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP68 | — |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Submersible to | 2 m | 2 m |
| Impact resistance (drop) | 2 m | — |
| Body material | Aluminium | — |
| Magnetic tail / base | Yes | — |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 105.4 mm | — |
| Head diameter / width | 38 mm | — |
| Body diameter / depth | 51 mm | — |
| Weight | 168 g | 90 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Switch | Dual switches | — |
| Strobe | — | Yes |
| Red light | Yes | — |
| Motion / reactive sensor | Yes | Yes |
| Lockout | Yes | — |
| Mode memory | Yes | — |
| Colours | Black | — |
