- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- HM65R-T V2.0 vs HP25R V2.0
Fenix HM65R-T V2.0 vs Fenix HP25R V2.0
What HM65R-T V2.0 does better (1) and where HP25R V2.0 wins (3) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.3Brightness & throw9.0
8.6Battery & charging9.2
7.4Build & durability4.9
5.6Light quality8.7
5.9Features5.9
Why is HM65R-T V2.0 better than HP25R V2.0?
- Weight140 g vs 238 g+70%
Why is HP25R V2.0 better than HM65R-T V2.0?
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)170 m vs 228 m+34%
- Peak beam intensity7,220 cd vs 13,000 cd+80%
- Maximum runtime300 h vs 400 h+33%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 1,600 lm | 1,600 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 7,220 cd | 13,000 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 170 m | 228 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Luminus SST-40 | Luminus SST-40 |
| LED maker | Luminus | Luminus |
| Number of LEDs | 2 | — |
| Colour temperature | 6,500K | 5,700K |
| Adjustable colour temperature | Yes | Yes |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | 18650 Li-ion, CR123A | 21700 Li-ion, 18650 Li-ion |
| Number of batteries | 1 | — |
| Battery capacity | 3,400 mAh | — |
| Maximum runtime | 300 h | 400 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | Yes | Yes |
| Battery level indicator | Yes | Yes |
| Also runs on AA/AAA/CR123A | Yes | — |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP68 | — |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | — |
| Submersible to | 2 m | — |
| Impact resistance (drop) | 2 m | 2 m |
| Body material | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | — | 60 mm |
| Head diameter / width | — | 47 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | — | 33 mm |
| Weight | 140 g | 238 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Brightness levels | — | 5 |
| Switch | Dual switches | Dual switches |
| SOS / beacon | Yes | Yes |
| Red light | — | Yes |
| Lockout | Yes | Yes |
| Mode memory | — | Yes |
