- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- HM65R-T V2.0 vs Neo3
Fenix HM65R-T V2.0 vs Ledlenser Neo3
What HM65R-T V2.0 does better (2) and where Neo3 wins (1) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.1Brightness & throw4.2
5.9Features5.9
Why is HM65R-T V2.0 better than Neo3?
- Maximum output1,600 lm vs 400 lm4×
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)170 m vs 80 m2.1×
Why is Neo3 better than HM65R-T V2.0?
- Weight140 g vs 62 g2.3×
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 1,600 lm | 400 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 7,220 cd | — |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 170 m | 80 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Luminus SST-40 | — |
| LED maker | Luminus | — |
| Number of LEDs | 2 | — |
| Colour temperature | 6,500K | — |
| Adjustable colour temperature | Yes | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | 18650 Li-ion, CR123A | AAA |
| Number of batteries | 1 | 3 |
| Battery capacity | 3,400 mAh | — |
| Maximum runtime | 300 h | — |
| Rechargeable | Yes | — |
| USB-C charging | Yes | — |
| Battery level indicator | Yes | — |
| Also runs on AA/AAA/CR123A | Yes | — |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP68 | — |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | — |
| Submersible to | 2 m | — |
| Impact resistance (drop) | 2 m | — |
| Body material | Aluminium | — |
| Size & weight | ||
| Weight | 140 g | 62 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Switch | Dual switches | — |
| SOS / beacon | Yes | — |
| Red light | — | Yes |
| Lockout | Yes | — |
