- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- HM65R-T V2.0 vs Neo9R
Fenix HM65R-T V2.0 vs Ledlenser Neo9R
What HM65R-T V2.0 does better (1) and where Neo9R wins (0) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.8Brightness & throw7.7
5.9Features5.9
Why is HM65R-T V2.0 better than Neo9R?
- Maximum output1,600 lm vs 1,200 lm+33%
Why is Neo9R better than HM65R-T V2.0?
Neo9R has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 1,600 lm | 1,200 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 7,220 cd | — |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 170 m | — |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Luminus SST-40 | — |
| LED maker | Luminus | — |
| Number of LEDs | 2 | — |
| Colour temperature | 6,500K | — |
| Adjustable colour temperature | Yes | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | 18650 Li-ion, CR123A | — |
| Number of batteries | 1 | — |
| Battery capacity | 3,400 mAh | — |
| Maximum runtime | 300 h | — |
| Rechargeable | Yes | — |
| USB-C charging | Yes | — |
| Charging time | — | 5.5 h |
| Battery level indicator | Yes | — |
| Also runs on AA/AAA/CR123A | Yes | — |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP68 | — |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | — |
| Submersible to | 2 m | — |
| Impact resistance (drop) | 2 m | — |
| Body material | Aluminium | Plastic / polymer |
| Size & weight | ||
| Weight | 140 g | — |
| Modes & features | ||
| Switch | Dual switches | — |
| SOS / beacon | Yes | — |
| Red light | — | Yes |
| Lockout | Yes | — |
