- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- HM65R-T V2.0 vs HC65M V2.0
Fenix HM65R-T V2.0 vs Nitecore HC65M V2.0
What HM65R-T V2.0 does better (3) and where HC65M V2.0 wins (2) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.1Brightness & throw8.3
8.5Battery & charging8.4
7.4Build & durability5.9
5.9Features5.9
Why is HM65R-T V2.0 better than HC65M V2.0?
- Maximum runtime300 h vs 110 h2.7×
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)170 m vs 165 m+3%
- Water protection (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx7+14%
Why is HC65M V2.0 better than HM65R-T V2.0?
- Maximum output1,600 lm vs 1,750 lm+9%
- Battery capacity3,400 mAh vs 3,500 mAh+3%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 1,600 lm | 1,750 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 7,220 cd | — |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 170 m | 165 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Luminus SST-40 | — |
| LED maker | Luminus | — |
| Number of LEDs | 2 | 3 |
| Colour temperature | 6,500K | — |
| Adjustable colour temperature | Yes | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | 18650 Li-ion, CR123A | — |
| Number of batteries | 1 | — |
| Battery capacity | 3,400 mAh | 3,500 mAh |
| Maximum runtime | 300 h | 110 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | — |
| USB-C charging | Yes | Yes |
| Battery level indicator | Yes | — |
| Also runs on AA/AAA/CR123A | Yes | — |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP68 | — |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx7 |
| Submersible to | 2 m | — |
| Impact resistance (drop) | 2 m | — |
| Body material | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Size & weight | ||
| Weight | 140 g | — |
| Modes & features | ||
| Switch | Dual switches | — |
| Strobe | — | Yes |
| SOS / beacon | Yes | Yes |
| Lockout | Yes | — |
