- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- HM65R-T V2.0 vs HC70 UHE
Fenix HM65R-T V2.0 vs Nitecore HC70 UHE
What HM65R-T V2.0 does better (5) and where HC70 UHE wins (1) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.8Brightness & throw7.1
8.6Battery & charging9.4
7.6Build & durability6.6
5.9Features5.9
Why is HM65R-T V2.0 better than HC70 UHE?
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)170 m vs 155 m+10%
- Maximum runtime300 h vs 220 h+36%
- Weight140 g vs 172 g+23%
- Peak beam intensity7,220 cd vs 6,010 cd+20%
- Impact resistance (drop)2 m vs 1.5 m+33%
Why is HC70 UHE better than HM65R-T V2.0?
- Battery capacity3,400 mAh vs 6,000 mAh+76%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 1,600 lm | 1,600 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 7,220 cd | 6,010 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 170 m | 155 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Luminus SST-40 | — |
| LED maker | Luminus | — |
| Number of LEDs | 2 | — |
| Colour temperature | 6,500K | — |
| Adjustable colour temperature | Yes | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | 18650 Li-ion, CR123A | 21700 Li-ion |
| Number of batteries | 1 | — |
| Battery capacity | 3,400 mAh | 6,000 mAh |
| Maximum runtime | 300 h | 220 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | Yes | Yes |
| Battery level indicator | Yes | Yes |
| Also runs on AA/AAA/CR123A | Yes | — |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP68 | IP68 |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Submersible to | 2 m | — |
| Impact resistance (drop) | 2 m | 1.5 m |
| Body material | Aluminium | — |
| Size & weight | ||
| Weight | 140 g | 172 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Switch | Dual switches | — |
| SOS / beacon | Yes | Yes |
| Red light | — | Yes |
| Lockout | Yes | Yes |
