- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- HM65R-T V2.0 vs NU53
Fenix HM65R-T V2.0 vs Nitecore NU53
What HM65R-T V2.0 does better (2) and where NU53 wins (4) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.8Brightness & throw8.0
8.6Battery & charging9.1
7.6Build & durability7.0
5.9Features5.9
Why is HM65R-T V2.0 better than NU53?
- Maximum runtime300 h vs 153 h+96%
- Weight140 g vs 151 g+8%
Why is NU53 better than HM65R-T V2.0?
- Battery capacity3,400 mAh vs 6,000 mAh+76%
- Maximum output1,600 lm vs 1,800 lm+12%
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)170 m vs 175 m+3%
- Peak beam intensity7,220 cd vs 7,660 cd+6%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 1,600 lm | 1,800 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 7,220 cd | 7,660 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 170 m | 175 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Luminus SST-40 | — |
| LED maker | Luminus | — |
| Number of LEDs | 2 | 19 |
| Colour temperature | 6,500K | — |
| Adjustable colour temperature | Yes | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | 18650 Li-ion, CR123A | — |
| Number of batteries | 1 | — |
| Battery capacity | 3,400 mAh | 6,000 mAh |
| Maximum runtime | 300 h | 153 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | Yes | Yes |
| Battery level indicator | Yes | Yes |
| Also runs on AA/AAA/CR123A | Yes | — |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP68 | IP68 |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Submersible to | 2 m | — |
| Impact resistance (drop) | 2 m | — |
| Body material | Aluminium | — |
| Size & weight | ||
| Weight | 140 g | 151 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Switch | Dual switches | — |
| SOS / beacon | Yes | Yes |
| Red light | — | Yes |
| Motion / reactive sensor | — | Yes |
| Lockout | Yes | Yes |
