- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- HM65R-T V2.0 vs I-Match 3
Fenix HM65R-T V2.0 vs Scangrip I-Match 3
What HM65R-T V2.0 does better (4) and where I-Match 3 wins (1) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.8Brightness & throw2.7
8.6Battery & charging2.8
7.6Build & durability7.1
Why is HM65R-T V2.0 better than I-Match 3?
- Maximum output1,600 lm vs 250 lm6.4×
- Maximum runtime300 h vs 15 h20×
- Battery capacity3,400 mAh vs 1,600 mAh2.1×
- Submersible to2 m vs 1.5 m+33%
Why is I-Match 3 better than HM65R-T V2.0?
- Weight140 g vs 100 g+40%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 1,600 lm | 250 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 7,220 cd | — |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 170 m | — |
| Light source | LED | COB LED panel |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Luminus SST-40 | — |
| LED maker | Luminus | — |
| Number of LEDs | 2 | 1 |
| Colour temperature | 6,500K | — |
| Adjustable colour temperature | Yes | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | 18650 Li-ion, CR123A | — |
| Number of batteries | 1 | 1 |
| Battery capacity | 3,400 mAh | 1,600 mAh |
| Maximum runtime | 300 h | 15 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | — |
| USB-C charging | Yes | — |
| Charging time | — | 3.5 h |
| Battery level indicator | Yes | — |
| Also runs on AA/AAA/CR123A | Yes | — |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP68 | — |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Submersible to | 2 m | 1.5 m |
| Impact resistance (drop) | 2 m | — |
| Body material | Aluminium | — |
| Size & weight | ||
| Weight | 140 g | 100 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Switch | Dual switches | — |
| SOS / beacon | Yes | — |
| Lockout | Yes | — |
