- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- HM65R V2.0 vs UT2000
Fenix HM65R V2.0 vs Nitecore UT2000
What HM65R V2.0 does better (4) and where UT2000 wins (2) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.2Brightness & throw9.0
8.8Battery & charging7.2
7.3Build & durability7.7
5.9Features5.9
Why is HM65R V2.0 better than UT2000?
- Maximum runtime296 h vs 55 h5.4×
- Maximum output2,200 lm vs 2,000 lm+10%
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)230 m vs 220 m+5%
- Peak beam intensity13,220 cd vs 12,126 cd+9%
Why is UT2000 better than HM65R V2.0?
- Battery capacity3,400 mAh vs 12,000 mAh3.5×
- Weight144 g vs 122 g+18%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 2,200 lm | 2,000 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 13,220 cd | 12,126 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 230 m | 220 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Luminus SST-40 | — |
| LED maker | Luminus | — |
| Number of LEDs | 3 | — |
| Colour rendering (CRI) | — | 97 |
| Colour temperature | 6,500K | 3,000K |
| Adjustable colour temperature | — | Yes |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | 18650 Li-ion | — |
| Battery capacity | 3,400 mAh | 12,000 mAh |
| Maximum runtime | 296 h | 55 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | Yes | Yes |
| Battery level indicator | Yes | — |
| Power bank function | — | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP68 | IP68 |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Submersible to | 2 m | — |
| Impact resistance (drop) | 2 m | 2 m |
| Body material | Magnesium | Aluminium |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 80 mm | — |
| Head diameter / width | 39.5 mm | — |
| Body diameter / depth | 52.5 mm | — |
| Weight | 144 g | 122 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Switch | Dual switches | — |
| Red light | Yes | Yes |
| Lockout | Yes | — |
| Mode memory | Yes | — |
| Colours | Black | — |
