- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- HM71R V2.0 vs HP35R
Fenix HM71R V2.0 vs Fenix HP35R
What HM71R V2.0 does better (1) and where HP35R wins (5) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.4Brightness & throw9.8
9.6Battery & charging9.5
6.9Build & durability6.2
5.9Features5.9
Why is HM71R V2.0 better than HP35R?
- Weight220 g vs 476 g2.2×
Why is HP35R better than HM71R V2.0?
- Peak beam intensity18,910 cd vs 50,620 cd2.7×
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)275 m vs 450 m+64%
- Battery capacity5,500 mAh vs 10,000 mAh+82%
- Maximum output3,500 lm vs 4,000 lm+14%
- Maximum runtime337 h vs 500 h+48%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 3,500 lm | 4,000 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 18,910 cd | 50,620 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 275 m | 450 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Luminus SFT-60 | Cree XHP70 |
| LED maker | Luminus | Cree |
| Number of LEDs | 2 | 2 |
| Colour temperature | 6,500K | 4,500K |
| Adjustable colour temperature | — | Yes |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | 21700 Li-ion | Built-in Li-ion / Li-Po |
| Battery capacity | 5,500 mAh | 10,000 mAh |
| Maximum runtime | 337 h | 500 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | Yes | Yes |
| Battery level indicator | Yes | Yes |
| Power bank function | — | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP68 | — |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Submersible to | — | 2 m |
| Impact resistance (drop) | 2 m | — |
| Body material | Aluminium | — |
| Magnetic tail / base | Yes | — |
| Pocket clip | Yes | Yes |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 111.5 mm | — |
| Head diameter / width | 50 mm | — |
| Body diameter / depth | 53.4 mm | — |
| Weight | 220 g | 476 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Switch | Rotary / scroll wheel | Rotary / scroll wheel |
| Red light | Yes | Yes |
| Lockout | Yes | — |
| Mode memory | Yes | Yes |
| Colours | — | Black |
