- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- HP30R V2.0 vs Nao RL
Fenix HP30R V2.0 vs Petzl Nao RL
What HP30R V2.0 does better (4) and where Nao RL wins (1) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.3Brightness & throw8.5
7.4Battery & charging6.2
3.4Light quality5.7
Why is HP30R V2.0 better than Nao RL?
- Maximum output3,000 lm vs 1,500 lm2×
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)270 m vs 200 m+35%
- Peak beam intensity18,220 cd vs 10,000 cd+82%
- Maximum runtime120 h vs 80 h+50%
Why is Nao RL better than HP30R V2.0?
- Weight437 g vs 145 g3×
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 3,000 lm | 1,500 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 18,220 cd | 10,000 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 270 m | 200 m |
| Runtime at maximum output | — | 1,440 min |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| Adjustable focus (zoom) | — | Yes |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Cree XHP50 | — |
| LED maker | Cree | — |
| Colour temperature | 5,550K | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | 21700 Li-ion | Built-in Li-ion / Li-Po |
| Battery capacity | — | 3,200 mAh |
| Maximum runtime | 120 h | 80 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | Yes | — |
| Charging time | — | 3.5 h |
| Power bank function | Yes | — |
| Build & durability | ||
| Pocket clip | Yes | — |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 92 mm | — |
| Head diameter / width | 56 mm | — |
| Body diameter / depth | 44 mm | — |
| Weight | 437 g | 145 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Brightness levels | 4 | — |
| Strobe | — | Yes |
| Red light | — | Yes |
| Motion / reactive sensor | — | Yes |
| Colours | — | Black |
