- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- HT32 vs TK20R UE
Fenix HT32 vs Fenix TK20R UE
What HT32 does better (3) and where TK20R UE wins (2) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
HT32TK20R UE
| HT32 | TK20R UE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length / height | 160 mm | 153.7 mm | +6.3 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 52 mm | 34 mm | +18 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | 25.4 mm | 25.4 mm | = |
| Weight | 185 g | 204 g | −19 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is HT32 better than TK20R UE?
- Peak beam intensity102,400 cd vs 54,060 cd+89%
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)640 m vs 465 m+38%
- Weight185 g vs 204 g+10%
Why is TK20R UE better than HT32?
- Maximum output2,500 lm vs 2,800 lm+12%
- Maximum runtime29 h vs 40 h+38%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 2,500 lm | 2,800 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 102,400 cd | 54,060 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 640 m | 465 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Luminus SFT-70 | Luminus SFT-70 |
| LED maker | Luminus | Luminus |
| Colour temperature | 6,500K | 6,500K |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | 21700 Li-ion | 21700 Li-ion |
| Maximum runtime | 29 h | 40 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | Yes | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP68 | — |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | — |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 160 mm | 153.7 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 52 mm | 34 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | 25.4 mm | 25.4 mm |
| Weight | 185 g | 204 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Switch | Dual switches | — |
| Tactical tail switch (momentary on) | — | Yes |
| Strobe | Yes | Yes |
| Red light | Yes | — |
| Green / blue / RGB light | Yes | — |
| Mode memory | Yes | Yes |
