- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- HT32 vs Marauder Mini
Fenix HT32 vs Olight Marauder Mini
What HT32 does better (3) and where Marauder Mini wins (1) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.0Brightness & throw5.9
4.0Battery & charging5.8
6.2Build & durability4.9
5.9Features5.9
Dimensions
Size comparison
HT32Marauder Mini
| HT32 | Marauder Mini | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length / height | 160 mm | 130 mm | +30 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 52 mm | 66 mm | −14 mm |
| Weight | 185 g | 462 g | −277 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is HT32 better than Marauder Mini?
- Maximum output2,500 lm vs 700 lm3.6×
- Weight185 g vs 462 g2.5×
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)640 m vs 600 m+7%
Why is Marauder Mini better than HT32?
- Maximum runtime29 h vs 30 h+3%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 2,500 lm | 700 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 102,400 cd | — |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 640 m | 600 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| Adjustable focus (zoom) | — | Yes |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Luminus SFT-70 | — |
| LED maker | Luminus | — |
| Number of LEDs | — | 3 |
| Colour temperature | 6,500K | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | 21700 Li-ion | Built-in Li-ion / Li-Po |
| Number of batteries | — | 1 |
| Battery capacity | — | 6,500 mAh |
| Maximum runtime | 29 h | 30 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | Yes | — |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP68 | — |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Submersible to | — | 2 m |
| Body material | — | Plastic / polymer |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 160 mm | 130 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 52 mm | 66 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | 25.4 mm | — |
| Weight | 185 g | 462 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Switch | Dual switches | — |
| Strobe | Yes | Yes |
| Red light | Yes | — |
| Green / blue / RGB light | Yes | — |
| Mode memory | Yes | — |
