- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- LR40R V2.0 vs EDC27
Fenix LR40R V2.0 vs Nitecore EDC27
What LR40R V2.0 does better (3) and where EDC27 wins (0) — every spec side by side.
9.1Brightness & throw6.2
Why is LR40R V2.0 better than EDC27?
- Maximum output15,000 lm vs 3,100 lm4.8×
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)900 m vs 305 m3×
- Peak beam intensity202,500 cd vs 23,260 cd8.7×
Why is EDC27 better than LR40R V2.0?
EDC27 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 15,000 lm | 3,100 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 202,500 cd | 23,260 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 900 m | 305 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Luminus SFT-70 | NiteLab UHi 20 |
| LED maker | Luminus | NiteLab |
| Number of LEDs | 6 | 20 |
| Colour temperature | 6,000K | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | Built-in Li-ion / Li-Po | — |
| Number of batteries | 3 | — |
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | — |
| Maximum runtime | 177 h | — |
| Rechargeable | Yes | — |
| USB-C charging | Yes | — |
| Battery level indicator | Yes | — |
| Power bank function | Yes | — |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP68 | — |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | — |
| Body material | Aluminium | — |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 175 mm | — |
| Head diameter / width | 82 mm | — |
| Body diameter / depth | 55 mm | — |
| Weight | 842 g | — |
| Modes & features | ||
| Brightness levels | 16 | — |
| Switch | Rotary / scroll wheel | — |
| Strobe | Yes | — |
| SOS / beacon | Yes | — |
| Mode memory | Yes | — |
| Colours | Black | — |
