- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- LR50R vs UT2000
Fenix LR50R vs Nitecore UT2000
What LR50R does better (5) and where UT2000 wins (1) — every spec side by side.
Why is LR50R better than UT2000?
- Maximum output12,000 lm vs 2,000 lm6×
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)950 m vs 220 m4.3×
- Peak beam intensity225,620 cd vs 12,126 cd18.6×
- Battery capacity16,000 mAh vs 12,000 mAh+33%
- Maximum runtime58 h vs 55 h+5%
Why is UT2000 better than LR50R?
- Weight987 g vs 122 g8.1×
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 12,000 lm | 2,000 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 225,620 cd | 12,126 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 950 m | 220 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Luminus SST-70 | — |
| LED maker | Luminus | — |
| Number of LEDs | 4 | — |
| Colour rendering (CRI) | — | 97 |
| Colour temperature | — | 3,000K |
| Adjustable colour temperature | — | Yes |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | 21700 Li-ion | — |
| Battery capacity | 16,000 mAh | 12,000 mAh |
| Maximum runtime | 58 h | 55 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | Yes | Yes |
| Battery level indicator | Yes | — |
| Power bank function | Yes | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP68 | IP68 |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Impact resistance (drop) | — | 2 m |
| Body material | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 163 mm | — |
| Head diameter / width | 88 mm | — |
| Body diameter / depth | 60 mm | — |
| Weight | 987 g | 122 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Brightness levels | 6 | — |
| Switch | Dual switches | — |
| Strobe | Yes | — |
| SOS / beacon | Yes | — |
| Red light | — | Yes |
| Lockout | Yes | — |
| Mode memory | Yes | — |
| Colours | Black | — |
