- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- PD35 V2.0 vs PD35 V2.0 Digital
Fenix PD35 V2.0 vs Fenix PD35 V2.0 Digital
What PD35 V2.0 does better (0) and where PD35 V2.0 Digital wins (0) — every spec side by side.
vs
4.2Brightness & throw4.2
9.7Battery & charging9.7
8.8Build & durability8.8
7.9Light quality7.9
5.9Features5.9
Dimensions
Size comparison
PD35 V2.0PD35 V2.0 Digital
| PD35 V2.0 | PD35 V2.0 Digital | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length / height | 138 mm | 138 mm | = |
| Head diameter / width | 25.4 mm | 25.4 mm | = |
| Body diameter / depth | 23 mm | 23 mm | = |
| Weight | 88 g | 88 g | = |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is PD35 V2.0 better than PD35 V2.0 Digital?
PD35 V2.0 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is PD35 V2.0 Digital better than PD35 V2.0?
PD35 V2.0 Digital has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 1,000 lm | 1,000 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 15,620 cd | 15,620 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 250 m | 250 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Cree XP-L HI | Cree XP-L HI |
| LED maker | Cree | Cree |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Maximum runtime | 430 h | 430 h |
| Battery level indicator | Yes | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP68 | IP68 |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 138 mm | 138 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 25.4 mm | 25.4 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | 23 mm | 23 mm |
| Weight | 88 g | 88 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Brightness levels | 5 | 5 |
| Switch | Dual switches | Dual switches |
| Strobe | Yes | Yes |
