How we scoreBlogAdvertise
html›body›main#compare791 models · updated Oct 21, 2026
  1. compoundsemi.com
  2. Compare
  3. PD35 V2.0 vs DN35

Fenix PD35 V2.0 vs Imalent DN35

What PD35 V2.0 does better (1) and where DN35 wins (3) — every spec side by side.

Fenix PD35 V2.0
Fenix · 2018PD35 V2.0
8.7Score
1 advantage≈ $70
vs
Imalent DN35
Imalent · 2018DN35
9.2Score
3 advantages≈ $105
Higher score
4.2Brightness & throw7.9
8.8Build & durability6.9

Why is PD35 V2.0 better than DN35?

  1. Weight88 g vs 115 g+31%

Why is DN35 better than PD35 V2.0?

  1. Beam distance (ANSI FL1)250 m vs 596 m2.4×
  2. Maximum output1,000 lm vs 2,200 lm2.2×
  3. Peak beam intensity15,620 cd vs 88,800 cd5.7×
Specifications

Side by side

Fenix PD35 V2.0Fenix PD35 V2.0≈ $708.7
Imalent DN35Imalent DN35≈ $1059.2
Light output
Maximum output1,000 lm2,200 lm
Peak beam intensity15,620 cd88,800 cd
Beam distance (ANSI FL1)250 m596 m
Light sourceLEDLED
LED & beam
LED emitterCree XP-L HICree XHP35 HI
LED makerCreeCree
Battery & charging
Battery—26650 Li-ion
Battery capacity—4,500 mAh
Maximum runtime430 h—
Rechargeable—Yes
Battery level indicatorYes—
Build & durability
Protection ratingIP68—
Water protection (IPx)IPx8—
Submersible to—2 m
Impact resistance (drop)—1.5 m
Body material—Aluminium
Size & weight
Length / height138 mm—
Head diameter / width25.4 mm—
Body diameter / depth23 mm—
Weight88 g115 g
Modes & features
Brightness levels5—
SwitchDual switches—
Tactical tail switch (momentary on)—Yes
StrobeYes—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare