- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- PD36 TAC vs MH25 V2
Fenix PD36 TAC vs Nitecore MH25 V2
What PD36 TAC does better (1) and where MH25 V2 wins (3) — every spec side by side.
Why is PD36 TAC better than MH25 V2?
- Maximum output3,000 lm vs 1,300 lm2.3×
Why is MH25 V2 better than PD36 TAC?
- Peak beam intensity18,770 cd vs 56,410 cd3×
- Maximum runtime43.2 h vs 1,500 h34.7×
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)274 m vs 475 m+73%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 3,000 lm | 1,300 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 18,770 cd | 56,410 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 274 m | 475 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Luminus SST-70 | — |
| LED maker | Luminus | — |
| Colour temperature | 6,000K | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | 21700 Li-ion | 21700 Li-ion, 18650 Li-ion, CR123A |
| Battery capacity | — | 5,000 mAh |
| Maximum runtime | 43.2 h | 1,500 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | Yes | Yes |
| Also runs on AA/AAA/CR123A | — | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP68 | IP68 |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Submersible to | — | 2 m |
| Impact resistance (drop) | — | 1 m |
| Body material | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Pocket clip | Yes | Yes |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 140 mm | — |
| Head diameter / width | 26.5 mm | — |
| Body diameter / depth | 25.4 mm | — |
| Weight | 92 g | — |
| Modes & features | ||
| Brightness levels | 5 | — |
| Switch | Rotary / scroll wheel | Side switch |
| Strobe | Yes | Yes |
| SOS / beacon | — | Yes |
| Lockout | Yes | — |
| Colours | Black | — |
