- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- TK16 V2.0 vs MH25 V2
Fenix TK16 V2.0 vs Nitecore MH25 V2
What TK16 V2.0 does better (1) and where MH25 V2 wins (3) — every spec side by side.
Why is TK16 V2.0 better than MH25 V2?
- Maximum output3,100 lm vs 1,300 lm2.4×
Why is MH25 V2 better than TK16 V2.0?
- Maximum runtime43.3 h vs 1,500 h34.6×
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)380 m vs 475 m+25%
- Peak beam intensity36,100 cd vs 56,410 cd+56%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 3,100 lm | 1,300 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 36,100 cd | 56,410 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 380 m | 475 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Luminus SST-70 | — |
| LED maker | Luminus | — |
| Colour temperature | 6,200K | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | 21700 Li-ion | 21700 Li-ion, 18650 Li-ion, CR123A |
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Maximum runtime | 43.3 h | 1,500 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | Yes | Yes |
| Also runs on AA/AAA/CR123A | — | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP68 | IP68 |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Submersible to | — | 2 m |
| Impact resistance (drop) | — | 1 m |
| Body material | — | Aluminium |
| Pocket clip | — | Yes |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 143 mm | — |
| Head diameter / width | 34 mm | — |
| Body diameter / depth | 25.4 mm | — |
| Weight | 112 g | — |
| Modes & features | ||
| Switch | Dual switches | Side switch |
| Tactical tail switch (momentary on) | Yes | — |
| Strobe | Yes | Yes |
| SOS / beacon | — | Yes |
| Mode memory | Yes | — |
