- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- PD36 TAC vs Angel Eyes E30 Pro
Fenix PD36 TAC vs RovyVon Angel Eyes E30 Pro
What PD36 TAC does better (0) and where Angel Eyes E30 Pro wins (1) — every spec side by side.
vs
5.7Brightness & throw8.1
4.6Battery & charging4.9
8.7Build & durability7.8
5.9Features5.9
Why is PD36 TAC better than Angel Eyes E30 Pro?
PD36 TAC has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is Angel Eyes E30 Pro better than PD36 TAC?
- Maximum output3,000 lm vs 3,500 lm+17%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 3,000 lm | 3,500 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 18,770 cd | — |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 274 m | — |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Luminus SST-70 | — |
| LED maker | Luminus | — |
| Number of LEDs | — | 3 |
| Colour temperature | 6,000K | 4,500K |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | 21700 Li-ion | — |
| Battery capacity | — | 3,000 mAh |
| Maximum runtime | 43.2 h | — |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | Yes | Yes |
| Battery level indicator | — | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP68 | IP68 |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Body material | Aluminium | — |
| Pocket clip | Yes | Yes |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 140 mm | — |
| Head diameter / width | 26.5 mm | — |
| Body diameter / depth | 25.4 mm | — |
| Weight | 92 g | — |
| Modes & features | ||
| Brightness levels | 5 | — |
| Switch | Rotary / scroll wheel | Dual switches |
| Strobe | Yes | — |
| Red light | — | Yes |
| UV light | — | Yes |
| Motion / reactive sensor | — | Yes |
| Lockout | Yes | — |
| Colours | Black | — |
