- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- PD36R PRO vs TK22 UE
Fenix PD36R PRO vs Fenix TK22 UE
What PD36R PRO does better (1) and where TK22 UE wins (4) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
PD36R PROTK22 UE
| PD36R PRO | TK22 UE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length / height | 145.8 mm | 150 mm | −4.2 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 26.5 mm | 40 mm | −13.5 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | 25.7 mm | 25.4 mm | +0.3 mm |
| Weight | 169 g | 150 g | +19 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is PD36R PRO better than TK22 UE?
- Maximum output2,800 lm vs 1,600 lm+75%
Why is TK22 UE better than PD36R PRO?
- Maximum runtime42 h vs 80 h+90%
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)380 m vs 405 m+7%
- Peak beam intensity36,100 cd vs 41,010 cd+14%
- Weight169 g vs 150 g+13%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 2,800 lm | 1,600 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 36,100 cd | 41,010 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 380 m | 405 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Luminus SFT-70 | Luminus SST-40 |
| LED maker | Luminus | Luminus |
| Colour temperature | 6,500K | 6,500K |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | 21700 Li-ion | 21700 Li-ion, 18650 Li-ion |
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Maximum runtime | 42 h | 80 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | Yes | Yes |
| Battery level indicator | Yes | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP68 | — |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | — |
| Submersible to | 2 m | — |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 145.8 mm | 150 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 26.5 mm | 40 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | 25.7 mm | 25.4 mm |
| Weight | 169 g | 150 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Brightness levels | — | 4 |
| Switch | Dual switches | Dual switches |
| Tactical tail switch (momentary on) | Yes | Yes |
| Strobe | Yes | Yes |
| Mode memory | Yes | Yes |
