- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- TK05R vs E51D
Fenix TK05R vs Nextorch E51D
What TK05R does better (2) and where E51D wins (3) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
TK05RE51D
| TK05R | E51D | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length / height | 115 mm | 142 mm | −27 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 32 mm | 27 mm | +5 mm |
| Weight | 124 g | 95 g | +29 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is TK05R better than E51D?
- Peak beam intensity50,620 cd vs 18,906 cd2.7×
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)450 m vs 275 m+64%
Why is E51D better than TK05R?
- Maximum output1,000 lm vs 2,100 lm2.1×
- Maximum runtime14.5 h vs 55 h3.8×
- Weight124 g vs 95 g+31%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 1,000 lm | 2,100 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 50,620 cd | 18,906 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 450 m | 275 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Osram CSLPM1.TG | — |
| LED maker | Osram | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | 18350 Li-ion | 18650 Li-ion |
| Battery capacity | — | 2,600 mAh |
| Maximum runtime | 14.5 h | 55 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | Yes | Yes |
| Battery level indicator | Yes | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP68 | IPX8 |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Impact resistance (drop) | — | 2 m |
| Body material | — | Aluminium |
| Pocket clip | — | Yes |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 115 mm | 142 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 32 mm | 27 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | 23.5 mm | — |
| Weight | 124 g | 95 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Switch | Dual switches | — |
| Strobe | Yes | — |
| Mode memory | Yes | — |
