- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- TK11 TAC vs TK22 TAC
Fenix TK11 TAC vs Fenix TK22 TAC
What TK11 TAC does better (1) and where TK22 TAC wins (4) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
TK11 TACTK22 TAC
| TK11 TAC | TK22 TAC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length / height | 140 mm | 154 mm | −14 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 34 mm | 40 mm | −6 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | 23.5 mm | 26 mm | −2.5 mm |
| Weight | 114 g | 156 g | −42 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is TK11 TAC better than TK22 TAC?
- Weight114 g vs 156 g+37%
Why is TK22 TAC better than TK11 TAC?
- Peak beam intensity28,060 cd vs 72,900 cd2.6×
- Maximum output1,600 lm vs 2,800 lm+75%
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)335 m vs 540 m+61%
- Maximum runtime47.5 h vs 49.5 h+4%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 1,600 lm | 2,800 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 28,060 cd | 72,900 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 335 m | 540 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Luminus SST-40 | Luminus SFT-70 |
| LED maker | Luminus | Luminus |
| Colour temperature | 6,500K | 6,500K |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | 18650 Li-ion, CR123A | 21700 Li-ion |
| Maximum runtime | 47.5 h | 49.5 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | — | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP68 | IP68 |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 140 mm | 154 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 34 mm | 40 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | 23.5 mm | 26 mm |
| Weight | 114 g | 156 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Brightness levels | 3 | — |
| Switch | Tail switch | Tail switch |
| Strobe | Yes | Yes |
