- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- TK11R vs TA20
Fenix TK11R vs Nextorch TA20
What TK11R does better (3) and where TA20 wins (0) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
TK11RTA20
| TK11R | TA20 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length / height | 145.5 mm | 100 mm | +45.5 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 34 mm | 30 mm | +4 mm |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is TK11R better than TA20?
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)420 m vs 200 m2.1×
- Maximum output1,600 lm vs 1,000 lm+60%
- Maximum runtime25.5 h vs 24 h+6%
Why is TA20 better than TK11R?
TA20 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 1,600 lm | 1,000 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 44,100 cd | — |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 420 m | 200 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Luminus SFT-40 | — |
| LED maker | Luminus | — |
| Colour temperature | 6,700K | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | 18650 Li-ion, CR123A | Built-in Li-ion / Li-Po |
| Number of batteries | — | 1 |
| Battery capacity | — | 800 mAh |
| Maximum runtime | 25.5 h | 24 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | Yes | Yes |
| Battery level indicator | Yes | — |
| Also runs on AA/AAA/CR123A | Yes | — |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP68 | — |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | — |
| Body material | — | Aluminium |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 145.5 mm | 100 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 34 mm | 30 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | 23.5 mm | — |
| Weight | 117 g | — |
| Modes & features | ||
| Switch | Dual switches | — |
| Strobe | Yes | — |
| Mode memory | Yes | — |
| Colours | — | Black |
