- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- TK22 TAC vs TA30C
Fenix TK22 TAC vs Nextorch TA30C
What TK22 TAC does better (3) and where TA30C wins (1) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
TK22 TACTA30C
| TK22 TAC | TA30C | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length / height | 154 mm | 136 mm | +18 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 40 mm | 30 mm | +10 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | 26 mm | 23 mm | +3 mm |
| Weight | 156 g | 97 g | +59 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is TK22 TAC better than TA30C?
- Peak beam intensity72,900 cd vs 22,950 cd3.2×
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)540 m vs 303 m+78%
- Maximum output2,800 lm vs 1,600 lm+75%
Why is TA30C better than TK22 TAC?
- Weight156 g vs 97 g+61%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 2,800 lm | 1,600 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 72,900 cd | 22,950 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 540 m | 303 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Luminus SFT-70 | — |
| LED maker | Luminus | — |
| Colour temperature | 6,500K | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | 21700 Li-ion | — |
| Maximum runtime | 49.5 h | 50 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | — |
| USB-C charging | Yes | — |
| Also runs on AA/AAA/CR123A | — | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP68 | IPX8 |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Submersible to | — | 2 m |
| Impact resistance (drop) | — | 2 m |
| Magnetic tail / base | — | Yes |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 154 mm | 136 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 40 mm | 30 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | 26 mm | 23 mm |
| Weight | 156 g | 97 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Switch | Tail switch | Tail switch |
| Strobe | Yes | Yes |
